Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.
Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2010). Delegating differences: Bilateral investment treaties and bargaining over dispute resolution provisions. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1), 1–26.
Asal, V., & Beardsley, K. (2007). Proliferation and international crisis behavior. Journal of Peace Research, 44(2), 139–155.
Babst, D. (1964). Electoral governments: A force for peace. The Wisconsin Sociologist, 1, 9–14.
Bates, R. H., Greif, A., & Levi, M. (2000). Analytical narratives. Social Science History, 24(4), 685–696.
Bates, R. H., Greif, A., Levi, M., & Rosenthal, J.-L. (1998). Analytical narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Beardsley, K., & McQuinn, B. (2009). Rebel groups as predatory organizations: The political effects of the 2004 tsunami in Indonesia and Sri Lanka. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(4), 624–645.
Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. (1998). Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 1260–1288.
Bennett, D. S., & Stam, Alan C., III (2003). The behavioral origins of war. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Brandt, P. T., Colaresi, M., & Freeman, J. R. (2008). The dynamics of reciprocity, accountability, and credibility. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(3), 343–374.
Bremer, S. A. (1992). Dangerous dyads conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816–1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(2), 309–341.
Brown, W. (2006). Africa and international relations: A comment on IR theory, anarchy and statehood. Review of International Studies, 32(1), 119–143.
Büthe, T., & Milner, H. V. (2009). Bilateral investment treaties and foreign direct investment: A political analysis. In K. P. Sauvant & L. E. Sachs (Eds.), The effect of treaties on foreign direct investment: Bilateral investment treaties, double taxation treaties, and investment lows (pp. 171–225). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Caporaso, J. A., & Pelowski, A. L. (1971). Economic and political integration in Europe: A time-series quasi-experimental analysis. American Political Science Review, 65(2), 418–433.
Caporaso, J. A., Roos, L. L., & Bohner, H. J. (1973). Quasi-experimental approaches: Testing theory and evaluating policy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Carnegie, A. (2014). States held hostage: Political hold-up problems and the effects of international institutions. American Political Science Review, 108(1), 54–70.
Cederman, L., Buhaug, H., & Rd, J. K. (2009). Ethno-nationalist dyads and civil war: A GIS-based analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(4), 496–525.
Cederman, L., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2009). Introduction to special issue on “disaggregating civil war.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(4), 487–495.
Cederman, L.-E., & Daase, C. (2003). Endogenizing corporate identities: The next step in constructivist IR theory. European Journal of International Relations, 9(1), 5–35.
Chan, S. (1984). Mirror, mirror on the wall . . . are freer countries more pacific? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 28(4), 617–648.
Checkel, J. T. (1998). The constructivist turn in international relations theory. World Politics, 50(2), 324–348.
Choi, S.-W. (2016). A menace to the democratic peace? Dyadic and systemic difference. International Studies Quarterly, 60, 573–577.
Choucri, N., & North, R. C. (1972). Dynamics of international conflict. World Politics, 24(2), 80–122.
Clarke, K. A., & Primo, D. M. (2007). Modernizing political science: A model-based approach. Perspectives on Politics, 5(4), 741–753.
Clarke, K. A., & Primo, D. M. (2012). A model discipline: Political science and the logic of representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Colaresi, M., & Thompson, W. R. (2002). The economic development-democratization relationship. Comparative Political Studies, 36(4), 381–403.
Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Day, A. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Cranmer, S., & Desmarais, B. A. (2011). Inferential network analysis with exponential random graph models. Political Analysis, 19(1), 66–86.
Cranmer, S. J., & Desmarais, B. A. (2016). A critique of dyadic design. International Studies Quarterly, 60(2), 355–362.
Cunningham, D., Gleditsch, K. S., & Salehyan, I. (2009). It takes two: A dyadic analysis of civil war duration and outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(4), 570–597.
Cunningham, D. E. (2016). Preventing civil war: How the potential for international intervention can deter conflict outset. World Politics, 68(2), 307–340.
Dafoe, A. (2011). Statistical critiques of the democratic peace: Caveat emptor. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 247–262.
Dafoe, A., Oneal, J. R., & Russett, B. M. (2013). The democratic peace: Weighing the evidence and cautious inference. International Studies Quarterly, 57(1), 201–214.
Deibert, R. J. (1997). Exorcismus theoriae: Pragmatism, metaphors and the return of the medieval in IR theory. European Journal of International Relations, 3(2), 167–192.
Diehl, P., Goertz, G., & Jones, B. (2005). Maintenance processes in international rivalries. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(5), 742–769.
Diehl, P. F., & Goertz, G. (2000). War and peace in international rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Diehl, P. F. & Wright, T. M. (2016). A conditional defense of the dyadic ap- proach. International Studies Quarterly, 60(2), 363–368.
Dixon, W. (1983). Measuring interstate affect. American Journal of Political Science, 27(4), 828–851.
Dixon, W. J. (1994). Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review, 88(1), 14–32.
Dorff, C., & Minhas, S. (2016). When do states say uncle? Network dependence and sanction compliance. International Interactions, In press.
Dorff, C., & Ward, M. D. (2013). Networks, dyads, and the social relations model. Political Science Research and Methods, 1(2), 159–178.
Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., & Lupia, A. (Eds.) (2011). Cambridge handbook of experimental political science. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Elkins, Z., Guzman, A. T., & Simmons, B. A. (2006). Competing for capital: The diffusion of bilateral treaties, 1960–2000. International Organization, 60(4), 811–846.
Ellis, G., Mitchell, S. M., & Prins, B. C. (2011). How democracies keep the peace: Contextual factors that influence conflict management strategies. Foreign Policy Analysis, 6(4), 372–398.
Erikson, R. S., Pinto, P. M., & Rader, K. T. (2014). Dyadic analysis in international relations: A cautionary tale. Political Analysis, 22(4), 457–463.
Franzese, R., & Hayes, J. C. (2007). Spatial econometric models for the analysis of TSCS data in political science. Political Analysis, 15(15), 2.
Fuhrmann, M., & Sechser, T. S. (2014). Signaling alliance commitments: Hand-tying and sunk costs in extended nuclear deterrence. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 919–935.
Galton, F. (1907). Vox populi. Nature, 75(1949), 450–451.
Gartzke, E., & Weisiger, A. (2013). Permanent friends? Dynamic difference and the democratic peace. International Studies Quarterly, 57(1), 171–185.
Gartzke, E., & Weisiger, A. (2014). Under construction: Development, democracy, and difference as determinants of systemic liberal peace. International Studies Quarterly, 58(1), 130–145.
Gibler, D. (2012). The territorial peace. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Gibler, D., Rider, T. J., & Hutchison, M. L. (2005). Taking arms against a sea of troubles: Conventional arms races during periods of rivalry. Journal of Peace Research, 42(2), 131–147.
Gibler, D. M. (2007). Bordering on peace: Democracy, territorial issues, and conflict. International Studies Quarterly, 51(3), 509–532.
Gibler, D. M. (2008). The costs of reneging: Reputation and alliance formation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(3), 426–454.
Gibler, D. M. (2010). Outside-in: The effects of external threat on state centralization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54(4), 519–542.
Gochman, C. S., & Maoz, Z. (1984). Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1976: Procedures, patterns, and insights. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 28(4), 585–616.
Goertz, G., Diehl, P., & Balas, A. (2016). The puzzle of peace: Explaining the rise of peace in the international system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldstein, J. S., & Freeman, J. R. (1990). Three way street: Strategic reciprocity in world politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldstein, J. S., & Freeman, J. R. (1991). U.S.-Soviet-Chinese relations: Routine, reciprocity, or rational expectations? American Political Science Review, 85(1), 17–35.
Gowa, J. (1994). Allies, adversaries, and international trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gowa, J. (1995). Democratic states and international disputes. International Organization, 49(3), 511–522.
Gowa, J. (1999). Ballots and bullets: The search for the elusive democratic peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hebron, L., James, P., & Rudy, M. (2007). Testing dynamic theories of conflict: Power cycles, power transitions, foreign policy crises and militarized interstate disputes. International Interactions, 33(1), 1–29.
Hegre, H., Østby, G., & Raleigh, C. (2009). Poverty and civil war events a disaggregated study of liberia. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(4), 598–623.
Hensel, P. (1996). Charting a course to conflict: Territorial issues and militarized disputes, 1816–1992. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15(1), 43–73.
Hensel, P., & Mitchell, S. M. (2005). Issue indivisibility and territorial claims. Geo Journal, 64(4), 275–285.
Hoff, P. D. (2005). Bilinear mixed-effects models for dyadic data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(4690), 286–295.
Hoff, P. D. (2015). Dyadic data analysis with amen. arxiv, arxiv:1506.08237, 1–48.
Hoff, P. D., & Ward, M. D. (2004). Modeling dependencies in international relations networks. Political Analysis, 12(2), 160–175.
Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200.
Jackson, P. T. (2008). Foregrounding ontology: Dualism, monism, and IR theory. Review of International Studies, 34(1), 129–153.
Jo, H., & Simmons, B. A. (2016). Can the international criminal court deter atrocity? International Organization, 70(Summer), 443–475.
Johns, L., & Wellhausen, R. L. (2016). Under one roof: Supply chains and the protection of foreign investment. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 31–51.
Jørgensen, K. E. (2000). Continental IR theory: The best kept secret. European Journal of International Relations, 6(1), 9–42.
Kadera, K. M. (2001). The power-conflict story: A dynamic model of interstate rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.
Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston: Little Brown.
Keohane, R. O. (1989a). International institutions and state power: Essays in international relations theory. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Keohane, R. O. (1989b). Reciprocity in international relations. International Organization, 40(1), 1–27.
Kerner, A. (2009). Why should I believe you? The costs and consequences of bilateral investment treaties. International Studies Quarterly, 53(1), 73–102.
King, G. (2000). Geography, statistics, and ecological inference. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(3), 601–606.
Lapid, Y., & Kratochwil, F. V. (Eds.). (1996). The return of culture and identity in IR theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Leeds, B. A. (1999). Political institutions, credible commitments, and international cooperation. American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 979–1002.
Leeds, B. A. (2003). Do alliances deter aggression? The influence of military alliances on the initiation of militarized interstate disputes. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 427–439.
Lemke, D. (2002). Regions of war and peace. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, D., & Reed, W. (2001). War and rivalry among great powers. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 457–469.
Li, H., & Loken, E. (2002). A unified theory of statistical analysis and inference for variance component models for dyadic data. Statistica Sinica, 12(2), 519–535.
Manger, M. S., Pickup, M. A., & Snijders, T. A. (2012). A hierarchy of preferences: A longitudinal network analysis approach to PTA formation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(5), 852–877.
Mansield, E., Milner, H. V., & Rosendorff, B. P. (2000). Free to trade? Democracies, autocracies, and international trade negotiations. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 305–321.
Maoz, Z., Kuperman, R. D., Terris, L., & Talmud, I. (2006). Structural equivalence and international conflict: A social networks analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(5), 664–689.
Maoz, Z., & Russett, B. M. (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 624–638.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
Minhas, S. (2016). Learning from Incredible Commitments: Evolution and Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties. PhD Thesis, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Minhas, S., Hoff, P. D., & Ward, M. D. (2016a). Let’s say amen for latent factor models. Working paper.
Minhas, S., Hoff, P. D., & Ward, M. D. (2016b). A new approach to analyzing coevolving longitudinal networks in international relations. Journal of Peace Research, 53(3), 491–505.
Mitchell, S. M. (2002). A Kantian system? Democracy and third-party conflict resolution. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 749–759.
Mitchell, S. M. (2017). Dangerous bargains with the devil: Incorporating new approaches in peace science for the study of war. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 34(1), 98–116.
Mitchell, S. M., & Prins, B. C. (1999). Beyond territorial contiguity: Issues at stake in democratic militarized interstate disputes. International Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 169–183.
Mitchell, S. M., & Prins, B. C. (2004). Rivalry and diversionary uses of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(6), 937–961.
Mitchell, S. M., & Thyne, C. L. (2010). Contentious issues as opportunities for diversionary behavior. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 27(5), 461–485.
Neumayer, E., & Spess, L. (2005). Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries? World Development, 33(10), 1567–1585.
Oneal, J., & Russett, B. M. (1999a). The Kantian peace: The pacific benefits of democracy, interdependence, and international organization. World Politics, 52(1), 1–37.
Oneal, J. R., & Russett, B. M. (1999b). Assessing the liberal peace with alternative specifications: Trade still reduces conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 36(4), 423–442.
Osiander, A. (1998). Rereading early twentieth-century IR theory: Idealism revisited. International Studies Quarterly, 42(3), 409–432.
Palmer, G., d’Orazio, V., Kenwick, M., & Lane, M. (2015). The mid4 dataset, 2002–2010: Procedures, coding rules and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 32(2), 222–242.
Peceny, M., & with Shannon Sanchez-Terry, C. C. B. (2002). Identifying the culprit: Democracy, dictatorship, and dispute initiation. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 15–26.
Rajmaira, S., & Ward, M. D. (1990). Evolving foreign policy norms: Reciprocity in the superpower triad. International Studies Quarterly, 34, 457–475.
Rasler, K., & Thompson, W. R. (2011). Borders, rivalry, democracy, and conflict in the European region, 1816–1994. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 28(3), 280–305.
Richardson, L. F. (1960). Arms and insecurity. Pittsburgh: Quadrangle.
Roberts, G. (2006). History, theory and the narrative turn in IR. Review of International Studies, 32(04), 703–714.
Rodrick, D. (Ed.). (2003). In search of prosperity: Analytical narratives on economic growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Russett, B. M. (1993). Why democratic peace? In B. M. Russett (Ed.), Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-cold-war world (24–42). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Russett, B. M., & Oneal, J. (2001). Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: W. W. Norton.
Russett, B. M., Oneal, J., & Berbaum, M. (2003). Causes of peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885–1992. International Studies Quarterly, 47(3), 371–393.
Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schelling, T. C. (1966). Arms and influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.
Senese, P. D., & Vasquez, J. A. (2008). The steps to war: An empirical study. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Signorino, C. (1999). Strategic interaction and the statistical analysis of international conflict. American Political Science Review, 92(2), 279–298.
Singer, J. D. (1961). The levels of analysis problem in international relations. World Politics, 14(1), 77–92.
Snijders, T. A. (2011). Statistical models for social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 131–153.
Sørensen, G. (1998). IR theory after the Cold War. Review of International Studies, 24(5), 83–100.
Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384.
Tetlock, P. E., & Gardner, D. (2016). Superforecasting: The art and science of prediction. New York: Broadway Books.
Thomson, J. E. (1995). State sovereignty in international relations: Bridging the gap between theory and empirical research. International Studies Quarterly, 39(2), 213–233.
Tilly, C. (2003). The politics of collective violence. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Toft, M. D. (2003). The geography of ethnic violence: Identity, interests, and the indivisibility of territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Vasquez, J. A. (1995). Why do neighbors fight? Proximity, interaction, or territoriality. Journal of Peace Research, 32(3), 277–293.
Vasquez, J. A., & Henehan, M. T. (2001). Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), 123–138.
Waltz, K. N. (1997). Evaluating theories. American Political Science Review, 91(4), 913–917.
Ward, M. D. (2016). Can we predict politics? Toward what end? Journal of Global Security Studies, 1(1), 80–91.
Ward, M. D., Hoff, P. D., & Lofdahl, C. L. (2003). Identifying international networks: Latent spaces and imputation. In R. Breiger, K. Carley, & P. Pattison (Eds.), Dynamic social network modeling and analysis: Workshop, summary and papers (pp. 345–360). Washington, DC: Committee on Human Factors. Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences Education. National Academy of Science/National Research Council, The National Academies Press.
Ward, M. D., & O’Loughlin, J. (2002). Spatial processes and political methodology: Introduction to the special issue. Political Analysis, 10(3), 211–216.
Ward, M. D., Siverson, R. M., & Cao, X. (2007). Disputes, democracies, and dependencies: A reexamination of the Kantian peace. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 583–601.
Warner, R., Kenny, D., & Stoto, M. (1979). A new round robin analysis of variance for social interaction data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1742–1757.
Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 385–390.
Weidmann, N. (2009). Geography as motivation and opportunity: Group concentration and ethnic conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(4), 526–543.
White, H. (2002). Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Williams, M. C. (2005). What is the national interest? The neoconservative challenge in IR theory. European Journal of International Relations, 11(3), 307–337.
Wong, G. Y. (1982). Round robin analysis of variance via maximum likelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77(380), 714–724.
Wucherpfennig, J., Hunziker, P., & Cederman, L.-E. (2016). Who inherits the state? Colonial rule and postcolonial conflict. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 882–898.
Zinnes, D. A. (1967). An analytical study of the balance of power theories. Journal of Peace Research, 3, 270–288.
Zinnes, D. A. (1980). Three puzzles in search of a researcher: Presidential address. International Studies Quarterly, 24(3), 315–342.
